Talk:Hungarian Alliance (Slovak political party)

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --Igec133 (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is a page for the newly formed coalition of Hungarian parties in Slovakia, which has over 5% in the polls.polls party--Igec133 (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MKÖ-MKS

In what way are they the same? Alliance is a political party, MKÖ-MKS only included SMK-MKP and MF but the latter left? Braganza (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge the articles. Braganza (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Összefogás was founded as a platform to unite the Hungarian parties and MKÖ-MKS was an electoral alliance disguised as party so they didn't need the 7% threshold, the article is written like Összefogás absorbed MKP & Hid which isn't the case. Alliance was a merger of MKP & Bridge but Bridge left and was refounded (and there was no important election during the time) and Alliance now is dominated by the MKP faction (which still exists within in the party) and is ideologically identical. So i propose MKP & Alliance and rename the history section.

I already started a similar request on German wikipedia [1] [2] where i went to more detail but i did not get much reaction too it. Braganza (talk) 14:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the merge since the party still has two factions – Magyar Közösségi Összefogás and SMK–MKP. It's also possible that in the future they will cooperate with another minority party.--CaeCalig (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

maybe cooperating in the future doesn't matter

and Összefogás is pretty small and not unique enough to make a real difference between Alliance & SMK–MKP Braganza (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support the restructuring, for what I'm reading there's a true mess in what respects the Hungarian minority parties and their coalitions so the restructuring to make it into less articles that better explain the mergers and dissolutions (especially if the other parties are supersmall) makes sense. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i made a first draft for a merger User:Braganza/MKP Braganza (talk) 09:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

support

Panam2014 (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This does look generally better structured Quinby (talk) 18:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support the restructuring proposal, with all due respects, the page is currently a mess. I’d propose, minimally, a massive reorganisation of the page because it is difficult to truly be informed with a page like this. Lexoomfie (talk) 09:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CaeCalig: i will merge them in 24 hours, so if any of you have something to add, do it now Braganza (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

pings

@Zsovar3 and Otapka: Braganza (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CaeCalig, Panam2014, ThecentreCZ, and Vacant0: Braganza (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MarkBA: because you took part in the German discussion Braganza (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]